Tag: firearms

Restoring Federal Firearms Rights: A New DOJ Proposal Explained

On By jaguidaIn UncategorizedLeave a comment

The loss and restoration of firearms rights after a disqualifying criminal conviction has become a frequent subject of litigation post-Bruen. A new proposal by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) aims to provide a pathway to restore firearms rights under federal law to those who would otherwise be prohibited through a detailed application process. It is important to note that this proposal is still in the comment period and no official application process exists at this time.

Understanding the Proposal

The new proposed DOJ rule seeks to create a structured and transparent process for individuals to restore their firearms rights. Applicants will need to prove that they are “not likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety” and that granting relief “would not be contrary to the public interest”.

The proposed regulations presumptively exclude from relief most violent felons, sex offenders, drug traffickers and many others who are deemed likely to re-offend. Some applicants, such as those convicted of drug crimes or misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence, will need to wait at least 10 years before they are eligible to apply. Others, including most non-violent felons, will need to wait a minimum of 5 years.

The proposed application process will require official documentation related to the underlying prohibiting conviction, supporting affidavits, letters, waivers and background checks.

State Law and Massachusetts

Massachusetts has some of the strictest firearms regulations in the United States. The new proposed DOJ rule clearly states that a restoration of federal firearms rights will not restore firearms rights under state law. This means that many prohibited people who reside in Massachusetts will not be able to access firearms even if their DOJ application is approved. A key exception – one alluded to in the proposed regulations – are those applicants who have restored their firearms under state law through the Massachusetts Firearms Licensing Review Board.

What’s Next?

The proposed rule is open for public comment until October 20, 2025. Comments will then be reviewed by the DOJ and the proposed rule may be modified. The DOJ will then decide whether to issue the new rule. The proposal anticipates the need for 50 employees and a total cost of $20 million to implement the new relief from disabilities procedure. The proposal relies upon an application fee to cover the associated costs. The anticipated cost estimate may be unrealistic and the need for Congressional funding may significantly hamper the implementation of any new regulations.

Our office is monitoring the new DOJ restoration of rights proposal closely. We specialize in the restoration of firearms rights and we expect to begin assisting our clients once the new regulations become effective.

Key Changes in Massachusetts Firearm Laws for Nonresidents in 2024

On By jaguidaIn Legal UpdatesLeave a comment

Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024, signed into law on October 2, 2024, has made it unlawful for nonresidents of Massachusetts to participate in target competitions with handguns or semi-automatic rifles/shotguns.

Pistol competitions, such as those sponsored by the USPSA, have been held at clubs throughout Massachusetts for many years. These competitions provide revenue to cash-strapped clubs and attract shooters from throughout New England. Unfortunately, the provision of Massachusetts law that allowed nonresidents to participate in pistol or revolver competitions, G.L. 140, sec. 131G, was repealed by Chapter 135. There appears to be no other exceptions for nonresidents to lawfully participate in pistol competitions without first obtaining a Massachusetts nonresident license to carry (LTC).

Similarly, Chapter 135 modified many of the provisions of G.L. c. 140, sec. 129C that allowed nonresidents to transport rifles and shotguns into Massachusetts. The new statute directs the Massachusetts State Police to develop a list of states that have permits similar to a Massachusetts firearms identification card (FID) as well as a list of states that issue hunting permits with similar requirements as Massachusetts. Nonresidents older than 18 years of age may possess rifles or shotguns in Massachusetts if a) their home state appears on the approved list (which has not been created yet) b) their home state issued them an approved hunting permit (this list also has not been created yet) c) they possess a nonresident Massachusetts hunting license d) while at a range and e) while traveling through Massachusetts if locked in a case and unloaded. In all situations, a nonresident MAY NOT possess a semiautomatic or large capacity rifle or shotgun without a valid Massachusetts LTC.

Black powder hunting also appears to have been affected by Chapter 135. Antique weapons are defined as muzzleloading rifles, shotguns and pistols that cannot be redesigned for conventional rimfire or centerfire ammunition. These weapons do not require a Massachusetts firearms license to possess. However, G.L. c. 140, sec. 129C(p), which allowed possession of black powder rifles, shotguns AND ammunition has been repealed. At least one Massachusetts court decision held that the Legislature must specifically exempt black powder ammunition for unlicensed individuals to carry the ammunition lawfully. (Commonwealth v. Jefferson, 461 Mass. 821 (2012)).

Law enforcement is still coming to terms with the new provisions of Chapter 135 and it will likely take time and court challenges before we know for certain how all of the new nonresident provisions should be interpreted. In the meantime, nonresidents should take caution before traveling into Massachusetts with a firearm.

New Mental Health Updates Causing Issues for LTC Holders

On By jaguidaIn Legal UpdatesLeave a comment

The MA Dept. of Criminal Justice Information Services (DCJIS) recently rolled out an update to the Massachusetts Instant Record Check System (MIRCS) in an effort to provide real-time mental health information to firearms licensing authorities. This new update has caused issues for both firearms license holders and firearms licensing officers.

MIRCS is the computer program that firearms licensing officers use to determine if an applicant is eligible to be issued a firearms license. MIRCS interfaces with several criminal justice databases and the Massachusetts court system. Licensing officers are notified directly by the courts via the MIRCS subsequent activity queue when a license holder is charged with a new criminal offense. The licensing officer can review the incident and decide whether to suspend or revoke the LTC in accordance with the licensing statute.

Current law prohibits the issuance of an LTC to a person who has been committed to a hospital for drug/alcohol abuse or mental health issues or placed under a guardianship for mental incapacity. Records of these events are often very old and many people have obtained an LTC despite having a commitment in their background. The recent DCJIS update connected the mental health records maintained by the courts with the MIRCS subsequent activity queue. LTC holders, many who have held the license for many years, are now receiving LTC suspension notices and are being forced to surrender their firearms.

Fortunately, Massachusetts adopted the provisions of the NICS Improvement Act which allows an individual to petition the committing court to restore firearms rights. The petition can be filed 5 years after the commitment date and petitioners are entitled to an evidentiary hearing.

We have successfully litigated many restoration of rights petitions for clients since the provisions of the NICS Improvement Act were adopted. If your license has been suspended due to the recent DCJIS update – or you are attempting to apply for an LTC but have a commitment history – please contact our office.

Traveling with a Firearm

On By jaguidaIn Legal Updates1 Comment

Most people are aware that federal law allows individuals to travel across state lines so long as:

  1. the firearm is unloaded;
  2. the firearm and ammunition are inaccessible from the passenger compartment of the vehicle (ie. locked in a trunk or locked in a case if the vehicle has no trunk);
  3. the individual can lawfully possess the firearm in the place he/she is leaving as well as the place he/she is going. (See 18 U.S.C. 926A)

But what happens if you need to stop? Perhaps you need gas or want to use a rest stop. What if you are flying and your flight is diverted? This is when otherwise well-meaning travelers run into trouble, particularly in states like Massachusetts where a license to possess a firearm is required.

U.S. LawShield, a self-defense insurance company for firearms owners, recently provided an update on this issue to its members. (Full disclosure – I serve as the U.S. LawShield Massachusetts Program Attorney). The link below details a scenario that is based on an actual case out of New Jersey and provides good information on what to do if your flight is diverted with your firearm in your checked baggage.

The underlying point is that you become subject to the laws of the state in which you are in once your firearm becomes “accessible”. That means if you are traveling through Massachusetts (or New York or New Jersey or another state that requires a license) and you stop for any reason, you could be subject to arrest for possession of a firearm.

“Flight Diverted, Security Alerted” – U.S. LawShield: https://www.uslawshield.com/flight-diverted-security-alerted/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newaletter_nl&utm_campaign=december_18_2019

Criminal Charges Dismissed After Lawful Self-Defense

On By jaguidaIn Helping Clients2 Comments

On a recent summer afternoon my client, a valid LTC holder, and his wife went to a shopping mall in a South Shore community.  When they pulled into the parking lot they observed a large male arguing with a female and noticed that a crowd was gathering near the disturbance.  As my client exited his vehicle, he observed the male shove the female into the passenger seat of a nearby car and jump on top of her.

Concerned that he was witnessing an abduction or perhaps something worse, my client ran quickly towards the parked vehicle.  As he approached, the male assailant aggressively sprung from the driver’s side door and took a fighting stance.  My client jumped back, removed his firearm from his pocket holster in a low ready position and put his left hand up, yelling “Stop, Stop!”  The assailant retreated and my client re-holstered his weapon.  The police arrived a short time later and the male assailant was arrested for domestic assault and battery.  My client was interviewed, his firearm was seized and he was charged with assault with a dangerous weapon.

In Court, it was essential to prove that my client used no more force than was reasonably necessary to protect himself.  Our evidence showed that my client wisely disengaged and called the police once it became clear that his assailant was no longer a threat.  After a hearing, the Court agreed that my client drew his weapon in lawful self-defense and dismissed the charges.

The use of a firearm in self-defense should always be a last resort.  If you are ever involved in a self-defense situation, please call my office as soon after the incident as possible.

Medical Marijuana Cards, LTC’s and Firearms Possession

On By jaguidaIn Legal Updates12 Comments

Federal Law

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) released a newsletter in 2016 reinforcing its position on the use of medical marijuana. In short, BATFE has determined that any person who uses marijuana for medicinal purposes is an unlawful user of controlled substances and prohibited under Federal law from possessing firearms or ammunition.  BATFE has instructed FFL dealers to 1) inform customers to answer “yes” to question 11(e) on Form 4473 if they disclose that they hold a medicinal marijuana card and 2) withhold the transfer of firearms and ammunition to any person who they have reasonable cause to believe possesses a medical marijuana card.  BATFE’s position on medicinal marijuana was upheld by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Nevada in August of 2016.

In 2019, BATFE released guidance on when a former medical marijuana card holder will be eligible to possess firearms:

“The following scenarios will be used to determine the disqualification period in regard to possession of a medical marijuana user card:
1.
One year from the date of the medical marijuana user card’s expiration date; or
2.
One year from the date of “admission” of possession of the medical marijuana user card, if no expiration date is available; or
3.
One year from the date the medical marijuana user card is relinquished.”

LTC/FID in Massachusetts

The effect of medicinal marijuana cards on Massachusetts firearms licensing remains cloudy.  On one hand, G.L. c. 140, sec 131(e) requires a licensing authority to determine whether the possession of a firearm by an LTC applicant would be a violation of state or federal law.  On the other hand, the medicinal marijuana law states clearly that people who qualify for medicinal marijuana cards shall not be denied any right or privilege under state law.  There have been no published cases to date addressing this issue and there are no known cases of LTC/FID denials due to medical marijuana use.  However, if you are denied an LTC or FID due to your possession of a medicinal marijuana card, please contact my office at (617) 383-4652.

Resources:

The original 2011 ATF opinion can be read here:

https://www.atf.gov/file/60211/download

The June 2016 newsletter can be read here:

https://www.atf.gov/explosives/docs/newsletter/explosives-industry-newsletter-june-2016/download

Wilson v. Lynch, 2016 WL 4537376, ____ F.3d____ (2016) can be read here:

Click to access 14-15700.pdf

A recent news article on this matter can be read here:

http://www.wbur.org/news/2018/07/16/massachusetts-marijuana-guns

UPDATE: The 9th Circuit has upheld BATFE’s opinion that any person who uses marijuana for medicinal purposes is an unlawful user of controlled substances and prohibited under federal law from possessing firearms or ammunition.  Applying intermediate scrutiny, the Court held that this ban does not violate the 2nd Amendment.

The case can be read here:

Click to access 14-15700.pdf

Charges Dismissed Against Client with Expired LTC

On By jaguidaIn Helping Clients2 Comments

My client was an out-of-state resident who had previously held an LTC in Massachusetts.  He was visiting some friends in the North Shore area and they decided to travel to a local gun range for an afternoon of target shooting.  He brought his own firearms with him for use at the range.

On the way to the range he was stopped by a police officer for an alleged minor civil motor vehicle infraction.  During the stop, officers observed firearms in the car and determined that my client’s LTC was expired.  He was placed under arrest for unlawful possession of a firearm and his weapons were seized.

After his arrest he hired a local general practice attorney.  His case dragged on for a year and involved several long, expensive court dates.  He knew that he was facing a minimum 18-month jail sentence and he became frustrated and scared.  He contacted me on the recommendation of a local firearms instructor and we immediately got to work.  In two quick court dates, the charges were dismissed.

The Massachusetts firearms laws are complicated and full of exceptions and defenses that a general practice attorney would not know.  It is essential to hire an experienced firearms attorney when facing serious criminal charges.